RSS

January 2025 Standard Forms Release: Updated Tenant Occupied Property - Buyer’s Notice to Seller for Vacant Possession Form

The implementation of Bill 14 introduced updates for buyers and sellers of tenanted properties under the Residential Tenancy Act. These changes affect how and when notice can be served to obtain vacant possession of a property and impose stricter penalties for non-compliance or bad-faith evictions.

To increase awareness about these changes, an information page has been added to the Tenant Occupied Property – Buyer's Notice to Seller for Vacant Possession form. This page outlines the updated requirements for requesting vacant possession, the personal information needed to generate notices, and the potential legal and financial penalties for non-compliance.

The addition of this new information sheet ensures that the form aligns with important considerations pertaining to the Residential Tenancy Branch's changes to its portal, which are now in effect as of Wednesday, January 22, 2025.

The updated form includes a new information sheet and is now available on WEBForms and the Royal Pacific Intranet.

Read

Legally Speaking #580 | Past Due: Expired Offers, Expired Contracts, and What to Do With Them

Real estate transactions often happen in a hurry. Many clients and REALTORS® also have busy lives and practices, and a number of things to keep track of. However, the legal principles of contract interpretation do not cut the parties or their agents any slack when complying with due dates in a contract. Depending on the type of obligation that is due, when these dates are missed, you can end up with an expired deal on your hands. While offers can be revived in some cases, contracts cannot. Even where revival is possible, there are pitfalls and consequences to be aware of and avoid.

Reviving an Expired Offer

An offer expires when an offer or counter-offer is not accepted by the specified acceptance date and time. There is no obligation on another party to accept an offer, but if they fail to do so by the required time, the offer can no longer be accepted.

Offers can technically be "revived" in that they can be made again on identical substantive terms by changing the time and date for acceptance to sometime in the future. However, this can be risky because it is not as simple as changing some dates; all terms need to be reviewed again to make sure they work on the new proposed timeline. Depending on the circumstances, the expired offer may include terms that do not make sense anymore or are not appropriate given the passage of time. The longer the gap between an offer's expiry and its revival, the higher the chances that at least some terms will need to change.

For example, reviving an offer may require adjusting other dates in the contract, such as subject removal dates or completion, possession, and adjustment dates. There may also be an opportunity for a buyer to do some of the due diligence initially included as subject conditions in the expired offer. Completing this step before re-making the offer can make it more attractive to the seller(s) and increase the likelihood of acceptance. Finally, if an offer has expired for a significant amount of time, the Contract of Purchase and Sale may have been updated in the interim. In such cases, the REALTOR® should use the most current version of the form when preparing an offer.

Starting a fresh offer, while preferable in most cases, is not without risk either. REALTORS® should ensure that all terms that their clients still want to include and that still make sense, are accurately carried over in the new offer. Extra caution is needed to ensure that nothing is inadvertently changed when entering information into the fresh offer form.

It is almost certain that any required information regarding the Home Buyer Rescission Period in an offer will have to be amended when an offer is revived, unless it simply needs to be extended by a few hours.

Expired Offer vs. Expired Contract

There is a difference between an expired offer, which is where an offer or counter-offer was not accepted by the specified acceptance date and time, and an expired contract, which is where a contract with subject conditions was entered into but one or more of the subjects were not removed by the specified subject removal date. Both documents are of no further force and effect. However, reviving an offer is possible, whereas reviving a contract is not.

Once a contract expires, the parties have an opportunity, but not an obligation, to enter into a new contract on identical substantive terms. One or more parties can also decide that they no longer want to agree to the previously settled terms and can either try to negotiate some changes or walk away from the deal entirely.

A contract cannot be revived by simply having one or more parties sign a subject removal addendum after the time for removing subjects has expired. It is also not advisable to attempt to revive a contract by using a simple addendum stating the parties agree with all the terms in the contract other than new subject removal dates. There are potential issues with the enforceability of such an addendum for failure to provide additional consideration, or value, for the change. It also creates a contradiction between the subject removal dates in the contract, in the addendum, and potentially other inconsistencies. Contracts that are not internally consistent can lead to serious legal interpretation problems, resulting in outcomes that your clients may not want or have not anticipated.

The best practice similar to with an expired offer, is to go through the contract term by term and carefully input them into a new contract form, making any date or sequencing amendments that need to be made as a result of the expiry. While this does not guarantee a deal will be re-made, it should avoid additional issues caused by inconsistent contract terms. If the Contract of Purchase and Sale has changed in the interim, REALTORS® should advise their clients of the changes.

Tracking Dates – A Realtor®'s Responsibility

If offers or contracts expire as a result of a REALTOR®'s failure to remind their clients of important dates requiring their attention, this can create both civil liability and regulatory issues. This risk remains even if the REALTOR® attempts to revive or re-make the offer or contract but fails to do so effectively.

REALTORS® should remind clients of all important dates in a contract or offer that requires them to act. If the client fails to take the required action, resulting in the expiry of a deal the client did not want to lose, the client may argue that the REALTOR® is at fault for failing to provide adequate warning about the deadline. While parties to a contract have an obligation to look out for their own interests and monitor important dates, it is likely that in most cases, the responsibility to track dates would be found to be shared if the matter were brought before the courts in a lawsuit for realtor® negligence or breach of contract.

There are also potential regulatory consequences for failing to advise clients of due dates and / or ineffective efforts to keep the deal alive once those dates have passed. For example, in a case decided by way of a consent order by the then Real Estate Council of BC (RECBC), a REALTOR® attempted to revive a contract after the subject removal period had expired. This was done by way of an addendum acknowledging that the subject removal date was missed but saying that all parties agreed that the contract was to continue. The REALTOR®, acting as an authorized dual agent, was disciplined, in part, for:

a) failing to act in the best interests of their client and to disclose all material information, as currently required by Rule 30 of the Real Estate Services Rules (the "Rules"), by not having advised their seller client that the buyer had missed the subject removal date; and

b) failing to exercise reasonable care and skill, as currently required under Rule 34 of the Rules, when they attempted to revive the contract by way of an addendum, since contracts cannot be revived.

Luckily, the transaction in that case ultimately closed without any damages suffered by the clients. However, the REALTOR® was sanctioned by RECBC for their actions.

As this article has hopefully highlighted, the easiest way to avoid revival issues is to simply not miss any contract deadlines. However, if it happens, REALTORS® should make sure they are taking the right steps to try to get the deal back on track, and to take great care as they do so.

Read

Property assessments see minimal increases for 2025

Property owners receive their 2025 assessment notices the first week of January, an assessment which reflects the market value as of July 1, 2024.

"Across the Lower Mainland and throughout BC, the overall housing market has generally stabilized in value for a second consecutive year," said BC Assessment (BCA) Assessor Bryan Murao. "Most homeowners can expect only modest assessment changes in the range of -5% to +5%."

For detached homes in the Greater Vancouver area, Burnaby and Pemberton tied with a four per cent increase. Other increases ranged from zero to three per cent.

For strata homes, the highest increase was two per cent in Port Coquitlam, Port Moody, and Delta. Following with an increase of one per cent was Coquitlam, the District of North Vancouver, Squamish, and Richmond.

For detached homes, the biggest drop was in Surrey which saw a three per cent decrease, followed by Pitt Meadows, with a two per cent decrease. Langley and Surrey stratas declined two per cent, while Vancouver and West Vancouver stratas declined one per cent.

For new construction or substantially renovated homes, the estimate is based on the physical condition as of October 31, 2024.

Viewing the assessment notice

Property owners can also see a property’s assessment using the address on BCA’s website.

Details include a photo, a property description (land and buildings), the total assessed value, the previous year’s value, the legal description and property ID.

If property details are incorrect, property owners are directed to complete and submit an Data Validation Form.

Property owners can also compare neighbouring properties and sample sold properties to decide whether their property has been correctly assessed. 

Deadline to appeal assessment is January 31, 2025

Property owners who disagree with their assessment should do homework by:

  • comparing their assessment with neighbouring properties; and

  • contacting BCA at 1-866-825-8322, talking with staff who can make adjustments if there’s an obvious error, for example if BCA included a complete renovation when there was only a spruce-up or an upgrade for plumbing or electrical.

Property owners who decide to appeal their property assessment should review information on the Property Assessment Appeal Board website on how to prepare for an appeal.

Each year less than one per cent of BC property owners appeal their assessments.

Note: you can’t appeal your taxes. You can only appeal your assessment.

For information about BC Assessment and to access e-valueBC visit: www.bcassessment.ca or phone 1‑866-825-8322.

Sample property value changes year-over-year, by neighbourhood

Location2024 Typical Assessed Value as of July 1, 20232025 Typical Assessed Value as of July 1, 2024% Change  
Anmore detached$2,544,000$2,575,000+1%
Bowen Island detached$1,365,000$1,374,0000%
Belcarra detached$2,045,000$2,074,000+1%
Burnaby detached$1,973,000$2,044,000+4%
Burnaby strata$731,000$732,0000%
Coquitlam detached$1,722,000$1,738,000+1%
Coquitlam strata$720,000$727,000+1%
Delta (incl Ladner / Tsawwassen) detached$1,406,000$1,410,0000%
Delta strata$747,000$759,000+2%
Gibsons detached$939,000$963,000+2%
Maple Ridge detached$1,226,000$1,223,0000%
Maple Ridge strata$658,000$655,0000%
New Westminster detached$1,567,000$1,590,000+1%
New Westminster strata$645,000$644,0000%
North Vancouver City detached$1,988,000$1,990,0000%
North Vancouver City strata$836,000$839,0000%
North Vancouver District detached$2,087,000$2,124,000+2%
North Vancouver District strata$945,000$940,000+1%
Pemberton detached$1,340,000$1,390,000+4%
Pitt Meadows detached$1,305,000$1,285,000-2%
Port Coquitlam detached$1,391,000$1,416,000+2%
Port Coquitlam strata$669,000$680,000+3%
Port Moody detached$1,842,000$1,851,000+1%
Port Moody strata$826,000$841,000+2%
Richmond detached$1,874,000$1,890,000+1%
Richmond strata$779,000$784,000+1%
Sechelt detached$884,000$885,0000%
Squamish detached$1,475,000$1,483,000+1%
Squamish strata$830,000$833,000+1%
Vancouver detached$2,209,000$2,206,0000%
Vancouver strata$807,000$798,000-1%
West Vancouver detached$3,050,000$3,052,0000%
West Vancouver strata$1,407,000$1,388,000-1%
Whistler detached$2,842,000$2,821,000-1%
Whistler strata$1,349,000$1,344,0000%

Source: BC Assessment

Did you know?

  • BCA is a provincial Crown corporation, since 1974 responsible for determining and reporting property value estimates.

  • Number of properties assessed province-wide: 2,207,009, an almost increase of one per cent from 2023.  

  • Total value of the 2025 roll is $2.83 trillion, an increase of just over per cent from 2023.

  • Total value of new construction, subdivisions and rezoning: $38.3 billion, a decrease of over three per cent from the 2024 Roll of $39.6 billion.

  • For the Lower Mainland region, total assessments generally remained flat from about $2 trillion in 2024, to $2.01 trillion this year.

  • Almost $27.2 billion of the region's updated assessments is from new construction, subdivisions and the rezoning of properties. 

Property tax

Property taxation is set by local and provincial taxing authorities after determining their budget needs and calculating property tax rates based on the assessment roll for their jurisdiction.

Municipalities determine tax rates for each property class in the spring, once the assessment roll is finalized. Changes in assessment over the year don’t automatically translate into the same percentage changes in property taxes for any particular class of property or for any individual property.

Questions?

Contact BC Assessment

More info

Learn more about Lower Mainland assessments

Learn about province-wide assessments

Read
Reciprocity Logo The data relating to real estate on this website comes in part from the MLS® Reciprocity program of either the Greater Vancouver REALTORS® (GVR), the Fraser Valley Real Estate Board (FVREB) or the Chilliwack and District Real Estate Board (CADREB). Real estate listings held by participating real estate firms are marked with the MLS® logo and detailed information about the listing includes the name of the listing agent. This representation is based in whole or part on data generated by either the GVR, the FVREB or the CADREB which assumes no responsibility for its accuracy. The materials contained on this page may not be reproduced without the express written consent of either the GVR, the FVREB or the CADREB.